| |
26 June 2009
Round table “Visa Liberalisation vs. EU Negotiation“ held in the
EU InfoCentre
On 26 June, a round table entitled “Visa liberalisation vs. EU
accession negotiations“ was organized in the EU InfoCentre in
partnership with the NGO Info Centre and the Macedonian Centre
for European Training, as part of their project “Time for EU”.

The speakers Ambassador Erwan FOUÉRÉ, Special Representative of
the European Union and Head of the Delegation of the European
Commission, Antonio MILOSHOSKI, Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Tito PETKOVSKI from the National Council on EU and Lidija DIMOVA
from the Macedonian Centre for European Training analyzed the
correlation between the visa liberalization and the progress of
the country towards the start of accession negotiations. The
panellists at the round table included: Dimitar MIRCEV,
Presidential adviser, Ermira MEHMETI, Democratic Union for
Integration, Ljubomir FRCKOVSKI, analyst, Bobi HRISTOV, TV Alsat,
Borjan JOVANOVSKI, Eurozum, Biljana SEKULOVSKA, TV A1, Marija
RISTESKA, Centre for Research and Polycu Making.
Ambassador
FOUÉRÉ pointed out that the visa liberalization is an excellent
example of what can be achieved when there is political will to
meet the criteria. “Still, visa liberalization is not the final
goal but an additional impetus for the further work that needs
to be done” said Ambassador FOUÉRÉ. He stressed that the country
needs to increase the efforts on the implementation of the rest
of the EU reform agenda especially in the field of
anti-corruption policy, judicial and public administration
reforms in order to achieve the recommendation for start of the
accession negotiations.
Minister Miloshoski said that the successful meeting of the
criteria for visa liberalization is a result of the joint
commitment of the EU and the country to this process, and
emphasized that the process of meeting the visa liberalization
criteria has a motivating effect for the Macedonian
institutions.
The participants generally agreed that the visa liberalization
is welcomed but that obtaining recommendation for start of
accession negotiations remains highest priority.
|
|